Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Gatekeeping is on the agenda in the geek world.

The first gatekeepers pointed to are the bullies that are self-appointed identifiers of "real" fans. 'Nuf said. They're full of it and we know it.

The second gatekeeper was more interesting. I didn't identify her as a gatekeeper at first, but now I see that for what it is. This particular woman made a test to tell if you are a "real" author. The result? John Scalzi failed the test with flying colors. Even more important, this test became just as much of a gatekeeper as over-fannish fans. This is important to state: not only should fandom welcome all who self-identify as fans, but must also welcome all those who self-identify as creators (writers, artists, etc).

What do we want in fandom? No gatekeepers. When do we want it? Yesterday.

Here's my metrics for identify fans:
- Do you call yourself a fan?
- Do you spend money on your fandom? (Or would you, if you had the money?)

That's is. A bad artist is still and artist. A lame fan is still a fan. An unsuccessful writer is still a writer. 


Aug. 7th, 2013 09:32 pm (UTC)
Love this! Is it public? Mind if I share it?
Aug. 8th, 2013 12:57 am (UTC)
It's public.